MCP Risk

Directory / server

com.ai-rete-rag/ai-rete-rag-mcp

This directory entry reports an automated security scan of com.ai-rete-rag/ai-rete-rag-mcp, scanned 2026-07-28. Trust grade D rates provenance, transport, known vulnerabilities and instruction integrity; capability risk is reported separately, not folded into the grade.

registry.modelcontextprotocol.io, scanned 2026-07-28, tool surface via package-source

D 57/100 permalink

Automated checks

StatusCheckPolicyResult
PASS Listed on the official MCP registry §1.1
Listed on registry.modelcontextprotocol.io as com.ai-rete-rag/ai-rete-rag-mcp. 1 finding
  • Registry entry: com.ai-rete-rag/ai-rete-rag-mcp
FAIL Source repository is public and maintained §1.2

Claimed source repository does not exist (or is private).

FAIL Published package is consistent and attested §1.3
Integrity concerns: package repository field does not match the claimed source repo; package is only 14 days old; no PyPI trusted-publishing provenance. 5 findings
  • Package: ai-rete-rag-mcp@0.5.1
  • Ecosystem: PyPI
  • Age: 14 days
  • Repo field matches source repo: false
  • Trusted-publishing provenance: absent
PASS Tool surface is inspectable and proportionate §2.1–§2.4
Package source scanned; no high-risk capability signals. 1 finding
  • Detected capabilities: none
INFO Transport & authentication §3

Local (stdio) server: runs with host-process privileges by design. Transport checks apply to remote servers; scrutiny shifts to §1/§2.

PASS No known vulnerabilities (OSV.dev) §4.1

No advisories on record for ai-rete-rag-mcp @0.5.1 (PyPI).

UNVERIFIABLE Server-supplied instructions free of poisoning indicators §5.1–§5.4

No server-supplied instructions or tool descriptions were obtainable to scan.

What this grade covers
  • Provenance & supply-chain integrity (§1)
  • Tool surface & capability risk (§2)
  • Transport & authentication (§3)
  • Known CVEs via OSV.dev (§4)
  • Instruction/tool poisoning patterns (§5)

Limitations: pattern-based only (no semantic injection detection), static npm analysis (live server instructions not retrieved for package-only scans), single-server scope (no cross-server toxic flow analysis). See the full policy.

Methodology: MCP Server Security Policy. Unfamiliar term? See the glossary.